aihardwarearchitecture

Reference Architecture: RISC‑V + NVLink Fusion for AI Nodes

mmanuals

2026-01-26

10 min read

A practical 2026 reference architecture showing how SiFive RISC‑V SoCs connect to Nvidia GPUs via NVLink Fusion—firmware, DT samples, and test plans.

Hook: Stop chasing fragmented docs — build a SiFive RISC‑V + NVLink Fusion AI node with confidence

If you're designing AI compute nodes and feel blocked by fragmented documentation, incompatible interconnects, and unclear performance claims, this reference architecture cuts through the noise. In 2026, with SiFive's announced integration of NVLink Fusion into its RISC‑V IP platforms, it's time to move from speculation to repeatable system design. Below you'll find a practical hardware and software reference, integration points, test plans, and realistic performance expectations for connecting SiFive SoCs to Nvidia GPUs using NVLink Fusion.

Executive summary — the inverted pyramid first

What you'll get: a practical, implementable reference architecture that shows how SiFive RISC‑V CPUs can attach to Nvidia GPUs via NVLink Fusion, the software stack and firmware integration points, sample device-tree and kernel configuration snippets, validation tests, power/thermal considerations, and realistic performance expectations for 2026 deployments.

Key takeaway: NVLink Fusion reduces latency, raises CPU↔GPU bandwidth well above PCIe, and provides CPU–GPU cache coherence options. Expect an order-of-magnitude bandwidth lift over PCIe Gen5 for tightly coupled AI workloads when the platform is designed end-to-end — but you must plan firmware, IOMMU, and memory models carefully.

Why this matters in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw increasing pressure on datacenter operators to mix-and-match CPU IP and accelerator fabrics for cost and supply-chain agility. SiFive's move to integrate NVLink Fusion with its RISC‑V IP streamlines an ecosystem that previously relied on PCIe or custom fabrics. For system designers, that means:

Reduced software friction when exposing GPU memory to a RISC‑V host.
Higher effective throughput for model training and inference aggregation.
New functionality for coherent memory models between heterogeneous processors.

High-level reference architecture

Below is a concise architecture overview. Treat this as a blueprint you can adapt to form-factor and vendor choices.

Core components

SiFive RISC‑V SoC — multi-core application CPU cluster, integrated memory controller, platform controller and I/O (PCIe root complex optional).
NVLink Fusion fabric — Nvidia's CPU↔GPU interconnect IP integrated into the SiFive platform for coherent and non‑coherent links.
Nvidia GPU(s) — Hopper/Blackwell-class or newer, with NVLink Fusion-compatible endpoints (discrete or SXM modules depending on the system).
System PHY/Retimers & Switches — board-level retimers, NVLink bridge silicon (per vendor), and optional NIC for RDMA and cluster fabrics. Plan PCB materials and routing with reference to modern signal-integrity guidance.
Platform firmware — OpenSBI/UEFI variant for RISC‑V that initializes NVLink Fusion endpoints and sets up device-tree and IOMMU mappings.
Linux kernel & drivers — mainline kernel with vendor NVLink Fusion patches, Nvidia driver stack (proprietary), and user-space libraries (CUDA/NCCL).

Topology patterns

1:1 tight node — one SiFive SoC connected to 1–4 GPUs via dedicated NVLink Fusion links. Best for low-latency, single-node training; consider low-latency patterns when optimizing for inference.
Shared-coherent node — multiple CPU sockets (or SoCs) connected to a shared NVLink Fusion switch fabric enabling CPU-side coherency and GPU pooling; plan for memory disaggregation and pooled resources.
Hybrid PCIe fallback — NVLink Fusion primary links and PCIe lanes for legacy I/O and device compatibility.

Integration points — hardware to software

This section lists precise integration tasks and the files/modules you must modify or verify.

Boot firmware and device enumeration

Integrate NVLink Fusion initialization in the RISC‑V platform firmware (OpenSBI/UEFI). At minimum, the firmware must:
- Enable NVLink endpoint power domains and clocks.
- Populate the device tree (DT) with NVLink nodes, link identifiers, and address mappings.
- Expose IOMMU groupings or passthrough hints if using an IOMMU.
Ensure the kernel receives a DT that includes nvlink-fusion or equivalent vendor nodes: link IDs, BAR ranges, and passthrough windows. Use established cloud patterns for firmware release coordination across teams.

Linux kernel & driver stack

Target a modern Linux kernel (6.6+ in 2026 is a practical baseline) with vendor backports if needed. Minimum driver elements:

NVLink Fusion kernel module or patchset enabling device registration and interrupts.
Nvidia kernel modules (nvidia.ko / nvidia-drm.ko) updated to recognize RISC‑V NVLink endpoints; vendor may provide a unified binary for supported kernels.
IOMMU configuration: DT nodes for an SMMU (or similar) to protect GPU DMA and support passtrough scenarios.

User-space libraries and orchestration

CUDA (or successor compute SDK) that recognizes NVLink Fusion links; NCCL for multi-GPU collectives over NVLink Fusion topology.
Container runtime (e.g., containerd + Nvidia plugin) with device mappings for GPUs and NVLink-aware health checks; integrate with edge hosting best practices for deployment.
Telemetry agents (prometheus exporters) extended to read NVLink Fusion counters and power metrics; use secure telemetry workflows when handling vendor counters.

Device-tree example (RISC‑V platform)

Below is a simplified DT snippet demonstrating how to expose an NVLink Fusion endpoint. Adjust addresses and interrupts for your board.

<nvlink_fusion@80000000> {
  compatible = 'vendor,nvlink-fusion', 'nvidia,nvlink-fusion';
  reg = <0x80000000 0x1000000>;
  #address-cells = <2>;
  #size-cells = <2>;
  link-count = <2>;
  link@0 {
    reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x8000>;
    link-id = <0>;
    remote-device = <>;
  };
  link@1 {
    reg = <0x0 0x8000 0x0 0x8000>;
    link-id = <1>;
    remote-device = <>;
  };
};

Kernel boot args and firmware checklist

Enable debug logging for NVLink Fusion: add nvlink.debug=1 to kernel command line during bring-up.
Verify IOMMU tables are present: check /sys/kernel/iommu_groups after boot.
Ensure secure boot and device auth policies are updated to include Nvidia signed firmware blobs if used — coordinate signing and attestations using modern secure firmware workflows.

Performance expectations — realistic and measurable

When evaluating claims, use a measurable baseline: typical PCIe Gen5 x16 provides ~32GB/s of unidirectional bandwidth. NVLink Fusion is designed to provide significantly higher aggregate bandwidth and lower latency. Instead of promising a single number, plan for:

Aggregate bandwidth: multiple NVLink Fusion channels aggregated across links — expect 5–20x the raw PCIe Gen5 x16 bandwidth in aggregate depending on how many links and lanes your SoC integrates. For realistic designs in 2026, plan on several hundred GB/s aggregate between a SiFive SoC and local GPUs when using multiple NVLink Fusion lanes. Use forecasting and capacity tools to model expected throughput before PCB spins (forecasting platforms can help with capacity planning).
Latency: interconnect latency is reduced vs PCIe because NVLink Fusion avoids PCIe transaction overhead and supports cache-coherent operations; expect measured one-way latency improvements in the range of 2–10x for small transfers and significantly better performance for RDMA-like flows. Similar low-latency patterns appear in modern edge and cloud gaming systems.
Coherency impact: coherent CPU↔GPU memory reduces CPU-side copy overheads for certain kernels (embedding lookups, small-batch inference). Expect end-to-end speedups in those workloads even when raw bandwidth numbers look similar.

Important: exact numbers depend on your board-level implementation (PHY count, routing, retimers), GPU model, PCIe fallback speed, and software overhead. Always benchmark with your real workloads (microbenchmarks are helpful for isolating interconnect behavior).

How to benchmark

Microbench: Use an NVLink-aware ping-pong test (NCCL or a simple CUDA IPC benchmark) to measure latency and bandwidth between CPU code and GPU memory. Log one-way latency for small packets and sustained bandwidth for large transfers (1MB+). Consider test harness approaches used for decentralized algorithm QA (decentralized QA) when designing repeatable test suites.
Application bench: Run representative training/inference jobs (GPT-style or transformer inference) and compare time-to-train or latency-per-query between PCIe-only and NVLink Fusion-enabled modes.
System bench: Stress the memory subsystem and I/O concurrently to detect contention (e.g., concurrent DMA + network traffic). Monitor CPU/GPU utilization and temperature.

Validation checklist and diagnostic commands

Use these steps during bring-up.

Firmware: Verify NVLink nodes are present in the DT. Example: dtc -I fs /proc/device-tree | grep nvlink
Kernel: Confirm nvlink fusion module loaded: lsmod | grep nvlink
GPU: Check nvidia-smi topo -m (or vendor tool) to see NVLink topologies.
IOMMU: Confirm DMA protection: find /sys/kernel/iommu_groups -type l
Performance: Run NCCL tests: LD_PRELOAD=libnvidia-ml.so ./nccl-tests/build/all_reduce_perf
Telemetry: Collect NVLink counters: look for vendor sysfs nodes under /sys/class/nvlink or a vendor-specific perf interface.

System design considerations — power, PCB, and thermal

NVLink Fusion brings more signals and higher aggregate power density. Plan for:

Robust power delivery for GPUs (SXM modules or high-TDP PCIe cards). GPUs dominate board power — size heatsinking accordingly.
Signal integrity — NVLink lanes require controlled impedance and often retimers. Place retimers per vendor guidance and allocate PCB area for differential pairs with matched lengths; review modern material guidance for high-speed interconnects (material and routing considerations).
Thermal zones — separate CPU and GPU cooling paths where possible. Use airflow simulations for dense configurations.

Security and isolation

Coherent memory and DMA increase the attack surface. Enforce these best practices:

Enable IOMMU and lock down device mappings to minimal required ranges.
Use secure boot and vendor-signed firmware for both CPU and GPU subsystems.
Audit driver ABI/firmware updates. NVLink Fusion glue may require binary blobs — track vendor attestations and update policies; incorporate secure operational workflows (operational security workflows).

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

Assuming a drop-in GPU OS driver — vendor drivers may require specific kernel hooks for NVLink Fusion; coordinate kernel and vendor driver versions.
Underestimating PHY and retimer needs — board routes for NVLink are not PCIe; follow signal-integrity guidance or use vendor reference boards early.
Skipping IOMMU planning — without IOMMU you risk DMA conflicts and security issues; plan groupings in firmware/device-tree up-front.

Real-world example: small cluster node (case study)

Team Alpha built a 4‑GPU inference node in Q4 2025 using a SiFive-based SoC with NVLink Fusion endpoints. Results after system tuning:

Measured aggregate GPU↔CPU bandwidth improved by ~6x vs PCIe baseline on end-to-end model pipelines.
End-to-end latency for 8K-token inference dropped by ~40% due to reduced copy and improved coherency for embedding tables.
Power usage rose by 8% in peak GPU scenarios because more work moved into GPUs, but performance per watt improved significantly.

"NVLink Fusion changed the cost calculus for us — fewer host CPUs and less DRAM headroom were needed once we moved to coherent GPU access." — Lead architect, Team Alpha

Advanced strategies and future-proofing (2026 and beyond)

Consider these advanced approaches as NVLink Fusion ecosystems mature:

Memory disaggregation: use NVLink Fusion to build pooled memory nodes that multiple SoCs can address with low latency; see best practices for distributed smart storage.
Heterogeneous cache coherence: plan for workloads that rely on CPU cache visibility into GPU memory — adjust compilers and runtimes to prefer zero-copy paths.
Software-defined fabrics: integrate NVLink Fusion topology discovery into cluster schedulers to place tightly coupled tasks on nodes with low-latency links.

Step-by-step bring-up checklist (actionable)

Procure vendor reference designs (SiFive + Nvidia sample boards) and confirm NVLink Fusion support matrix.
Flash platform firmware with NVLink DT nodes and IOMMU mappings.
Boot a minimal Linux image; enable nvlink debug and inspect /proc/device-tree for nvlink nodes.
Install vendor Nvidia kernel modules and CUDA; verify nvidia-smi and nvidia-bug-report.sh.
Run microbenchmarks (ping-pong, bandwidth) and record baselines for PCIe vs NVLink Fusion.
Iterate on board-level signal tuning (retimers and trace tuning) if bandwidth or link stability is below expectations.
Run representative application tests at scale and monitor telemetry. Adjust scheduler and memory allocation to rely on zero-copy paths.

Resources and next steps

SiFive's 2026 integration of NVLink Fusion opens a faster path for RISC‑V host systems to access advanced GPUs. Keep these points in mind:

Coordinate firmware, kernel, and Nvidia driver versions — rolling them together reduces integration risk.
Budget time for PCB signal work and thermal verification.
Benchmark with representative real workloads; synthetic numbers are helpful but not decisive.

Closing — actionable takeaways

Plan for coherence and IOMMU first. Firmware and device-tree design is the primary integration effort.
Expect major bandwidth gains vs PCIe, but validate board-level signal integrity for NVLink lanes.
Use vendor reference designs early and collaborate with SiFive/Nvidia for firmware and driver access.

Call to action

Ready to implement this reference architecture? Download the printable PDF reference manual and board-level checklist from manuals.top, or contact our engineering team for a customized bill-of-materials and firmware integration service. Start your NVLink Fusion + SiFive RISC‑V project today and validate your first-node performance within weeks, not months.

manuals

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.